Dear Colleague,
SyEN is an independent free newsletter containing informative reading for the technical project professional, with scores of news and other items summarizing developments in the field, including related industry, month by month. This newsletter and a newsletter archive are also available at www.ppi-int.com.
Systems engineering can be thought of as the problem-independent, and solution/technology-independent, principles and methods related to the successful engineering of systems, to meet stakeholder requirements and maximize value delivered to stakeholders in accordance with their values.
If you are presently receiving this newsletter from an associate, you may receive the newsletter directly in future by signing up for this free service of PPI, using the form at www.ppi-int.com. If you do not wish to receive future SE eNewsletters, please reply to the notifying e-mail with "Remove" in the subject line, from the same email address. Your removal will be confirmed, by email.
We hope that you find this newsletter to be informative and useful. Please tell us what you think. Email to: contact@ppi-int.com.
A Quotation to Open On
Featured Article
Systems Engineering News
Featured Society - International Test and Evaluation Association (ITEA)
INCOSE Technical Operations - Systems Security Engineering Working Group
Systems Engineering Software Tools News
Systems Engineering Books, Reports, Articles and Papers
Conferences and Meetings
Education and Academia
Some Systems Engineering-Relevant Websites
Standards and Guides
Some Definitions to Close On - Specification
PPI News
PPI Events
"Four models were examined highlighting various issues encountered in the application of these specifications. SysML and UPDM can best be described as emerging technologies" - National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Intelligent Systems Division, July 2010
Having been trained as an engineer and practising systems engineering for a long time, the concept of reductionism is not unfamiliar. This is after all how we deal with complex systems – by breaking it down into individual elements that we can understand and comprehend. Systems thinking has always been the understanding that systems exist within a context that influences their dynamic behaviour and that their behaviour is not only determined by the behaviour of their elements – right? - That was until I read “Thinking in Systems” by Donella Meadows. For me this was what Gene Bellinger calls an Aha! moment on the Systems Thinking World LinkedIn group.
Meadows defines a system as “a set of things interconnected in such a way that they produce their own pattern of behaviour over time”. Another central insight explained right at the beginning of the book is the relationship between structure and behaviour of a system. A system also has a distinct purpose that is deduced from its behaviour. It is however the interconnections between the elements of the system and between the system and other systems in its context that greatly define its behaviour over time.
In modelling the behaviour of systems, Causal Loops Diagram (CLD) and Stock & Flow Diagrams are quite often used. The existence and impact of feedback loops, either balancing or reinforcing, is the last essential concept in understanding and modelling system behaviour. These concepts are all very well explained on www.systemswiki.org where all four of the above links will redirect the reader.
For me the highlight of “Thinking in Systems” are the system archetypes that Meadows identify as well as leverage points to intervene in a system. Armed with this basic knowledge one can begin to understand the true value and application of systems thinking. The system archetypes or “System Traps... and Opportunities” as identified by Meadows include:
Each of these is discussed by Meadows in the form of a definition, a discussion of typical examples and finally, the way out of the system trap. Below is a summary of the definition and the way out for each archetype. Most of these have also been modelled by Gene Bellinger on www.systemswiki.org and the links to these models are also included.
Definition (Meadows): “When various actors try to pull a system stock towards various goals, the result can be policy resistance. Any new policy, especially if it’s effective, just pulls the stock farther from the goals of other actors and produces additional resistance, with a result that no one likes, but everyone expends considerable effort in maintaining.”
The Way Out (Meadows): “Let go. Bring in all the actors and use the energy formerly expended on resistance to seek out mutually satisfactory ways for all goals to be realized – or redefinitions of larger and more important goals that everyone can pull toward together.”
Fixes that Fail Systems Archetype as explained on www.systemswiki.org
Definition (Meadows): “When there is a commonly shared resource, every user benefits directly from its use, but shares the costs of its abuse with everyone else. Therefore, there is very weak feedback from the condition of the resource to the decisions of the resource users. The consequence is overuse of the resource, eroding it until it becomes unavailable to anyone.”
The Way Out (Meadows): “Educate and exhort the users, so they understand the consequences of abusing the resource. And also restore or strengthen the missing feedback link, either by privatizing the resource so each user feels the direct consequences of its abuse or (since many resources cannot be privatized) by regulating the access of all users to the resource.”
Tragedy of the Commons Systems Archetype as explained on www.systemswiki.org
Definition (Meadows): “Allowing performance standards to be influenced by past performance, especially if there is a negative bias in perceiving past performance, sets up a reinforcing feedback loop of eroding goals that sets a system drifting toward low performance.”
The Way Out (Meadows): “Keep performance standards absolute. Even better, let standards be enhanced by the best actual performances instead of being discouraged by the worst. Use the same structure to set up a drift toward high performance!”
Drifting Goals Systems Archetype as explained on www.systemswiki.org
Definition (Meadows): When the state of one stock is determined by trying to surpass the state of another stock -and vice versa- then there is a reinforcing feedback loop carrying the system into an arms race, a wealth race, a smear campaign, escalating loudness, escalating violence. The escalation is exponential and can lead to extremes surprisingly quickly. If nothing is done, the spiral will be stopped by someone's collapse - because exponential growth cannot go on forever.
The Way Out (Meadows): The best way out of this trap is to avoid getting in it. If caught in an escalating system, one can refuse to compete (unilaterally disarm), thereby interrupting the reinforcing loop. Or one can negotiate a new system with balancing loops to control the escalation.
Escalation Systems Archetype as explained on www.systemswiki.org
Definition (Meadows): If the winners of a competition are systematically rewarded with the means to win again, a reinforcing feedback loop is created by which, if it is allowed to proceed uninhibited, the winners eventually take all, while the losers are eliminated.
The Way Out (Meadows): Diversification, which allows those who are losing the competition to get out of that game and start another one; strict limitation on the fraction of the pie any one winner may win (antitrust laws); policies that level the playing field, removing some of the advantage of the strongest players or increasing the advantage of the weakest; policies that devise rewards for success that do not bias the next round of competition.
Success to the Successful Systems Archetype as explained on www.systemswiki.org
Definition (Meadows): Shifting the burden, dependence, and addiction arise when a solution to a systemic problem reduces (or disguises) the symptoms, but does nothing to solve the underlying problem. Whether it is a substance that dulls one's perception or a policy that hides the underlying trouble, the drug of choice interferes with the actions that could solve the real problem.
If the intervention designed to correct the problem causes the self-maintaining capacity of the original system to atrophy or erode, then a destructive reinforcing feedback loop is set in motion. The system deteriorates; more and more of the solution is then required. The system will become more and more dependent on the intervention and less and less able to maintain its own desired state.
The Way Out (Meadows): Again, the best way out of this trap is to avoid getting in. Beware of symptom-relieving or signal-denying policies or practices that don't really address the problem. Take the focus off short-term relief and put it on long-term restructuring.
Shifting the Burden Systems Archetype as explained on www.systemswiki.org
Addiction Systems Archetype as explained on www.systemswiki.org
Definition (Meadows): Rules to govern a system can lead to rule beating - perverse behaviour that gives the appearance of obeying the rules or achieving the goals, but that actually distorts the system.
The Way Out (Meadows): Design, or redesign, rules to release creativity not in the direction of beating the rules, but in the direction of achieving the purpose of the rules.
Definition (Meadows): System behaviour is particularly sensitive to the goals of feedback loops. If the goals - the indicators of satisfaction of the rules - are defined inaccurately or incompletely, the system may obediently work to produce a result that is not really intended or wanted.
The Way Out (Meadows): Specify indicators and goals that reflect the real welfare of the system. Be especially careful not to confuse effort with result or you will end up with a system that is producing effort, not result.
References:
1) Meadows, Donella H., Thinking in Systems, Chelsea Green Publishing, 2008.
Alwyn has more than twenty years experience in the defence industry in the development of custom built system solutions for SANDF clients. He acted in both project management and system engineering roles on a number of major projects. Alwyn is a founding member of the South African Chapter of the International Council on Systems Engineering. He was the 2007 INCOSE SA Chapter President and is currently an INCOSE ambassador. He has developed a recent but very keen interest in the application of systems thinking to real world problems.
By A Smit
Despite a previous conviction that I simply cannot sleep upright like a chicken in a coop, I have done it again - I tackled the long trip from Cape Town to Chicago for the INCOSE International Symposium 2010 from 12 to 15 July, which also happened to be the 20th birthday anniversary of INCOSE.
Arriving on the Saturday and not having to attend one of the many business meetings scheduled over the weekend, I used the rest of the day to recover from flight-induced sleep deprivation. On Sunday I attended an IEEE paper track of 9 papers provided by the IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society, one of the IEEE Systems Council’s members. The papers focused on the systems engineering of complex systems for space, air, ocean or ground environments. This is certainly a useful first time addition to the symposium that should really be repeated in future.
On Monday the symposium was in full swing. The day started with an opening plenary featuring a keynote speech on The Status and Nature of K-12 Engineering Education in the United States. To me this was an indication of the importance with which the youth outreach is viewed by INCOSE. The day continued with the usual 5 tracks of papers and panels which made you feel like a chameleon in a box of Nestlé Smarties. Each track was divided into three sessions separated by coffee breaks and lunch, with each session having a specific theme. Themes included “SE Competence”, “Enterprise Applications”, “Energy Applications”, “MBSE Applications”, “SE Education”, “Large Scale Architecture”, “SE Applications in Transportation”, “Resilient Systems”, “Security Applications”, and “Architecture of Complex Systems”.
The two best paper awards for the day were “Design Principles for Ultra-Large-Scale (ULS) Systems” and “An Enterprise Systems Engineering Framework”.
Panel discussions were also held on: “Is MBSE a Tectonic Shift in the Way We Perform Systems Engineering?”, “Systems Engineering the Supply Chain: Multiple Perspectives from Transportation”, “Biomedical SE: Modeling & Patient Safety from Pharma to Devices” and “ISO/IEC 156288 and 12207 Modeling to Assess Harmonization”.
My personal interest was in SE Competency and SE Education, with highlights being the papers on “Systems Engineering Competency - The Missing Element in Engineering Education” by Charles Wasson, and “Graduate Program in Multi-Disciplinary System Design and Management” by a number of authors from Keio University. What is clear to me is that more and more people realize the need for not only teaching the “What” of Systems Engineering, but also the “How” and the “Why”.
Tuesday again started with a keynote speech on “Perspectives on the Critical Role of Systems Engineering”. The paper sessions saw a similar mix of session themes with most continued from Monday and with the addition of “SE Applications in Defence”, “Commercial SE Applications”, “SE Principles”, “SE Knowledge Management” and “Systematic Strategy”. These sessions included a best paper award on “Simulation and Verification of (Dys)functional Behaviour Models: Model Checking for SE”.
The paper sessions were complemented by panel discussions/round tables on “Motor Sports Accelerates SySTEM Learning”, “Transportation Industry Roundtable: Assessing State of the Practice”, “The Future of Knowledge Management in INCOSE” and the all important Academic Forum addressing “Youth Engineering Education Outreach” and “The Graduate Reference Curriculum on Systems Engineering (GRCSE)”. This last session of the Academic Forum certainly created a stir with a presentation by Joe Kasser questioning the value of the BKCASE project consisting of the Body of Knowledge and the GRCSE. Personally I think he had a good point and when the first draft of GRCSE is released, I will be taking a critical look of my own at the real value added. Till then I will keep an open mind.
The keynote speech on Wednesday was on “Systems Engineering and Patient Safety” – everybody certainly sat up and took notice of the issues around patient safety and equipment interoperability. Session themes for Wednesday included “Decision Making”, “Complex Systems”, “Ontology”, “Requirements”, “SE Applications in Biomedical” and “Modular & Agile Architecture” with a Workshop on “Youth Engineering Education Outreach”, panels on “Lean SE: Who can Afford to Ignore it?” and “Self Organising vs Standards-Based System-Security Strategy - Conflict or Synergy”, roundtable on “Critical Unmet Biomedical System Needs” and the continuation of the Academic Forum with “Leveraging Motor Sports to Accelerate SySTEM Learning” and “System Engineering Research: Content and Future Trends”. The last paper session on “Requirements” included an award winning paper on “RELAAy - A Tool to Guide HSI Requirements”. This was indeed an impressive paper with a lot of research behind it to look at incident data, filter out the Human Systems Integration related causes and feed it back to the designers of new systems - all automated in a set of spreadsheets. A valuable tool if you really want to learn from the lessons learnt.
Wednesday also saw the usual Symposium Banquet and was held at the Navy Pier. The food and entertainment were great as we have become accustomed to, but the highlight was an absolutely awesome fireworks display. What a superb way to celebrate the 20th anniversary of INCOSE!
Thursday is thankfully always a shorter day with only two instead of three paper sessions in four tracks. The session themes included “Models for Risk Management”, “Space Systems Applications”, “Architecture of Complex Systems”, “Agile Systems”, “Early R&D Applications”, “Systems Management”, “ROI & Lean SE” as well as a panel discussion on “Architecting the Enterprise: Is INCOSE up to the Challenge?”. The day included two best paper awards for “Classification of Systems from Component Characteristics” and “Piloting Model Based Engineering Techniques for Spacecraft Concepts in Early Formulation”. Personally I have found the paper presented by Eric Honour on “Systems Engineering Return on Investment” really enlightening. Besides basically confirming the amount of SE done by successful projects to be around 15 %, the research showed that projects doing the proper amount of SE do not necessarily deliver better systems. This was indeed surprising – it basically means that even if you do not do SE formally, you will eventually be able to deliver a good system, be it at huge overspending and late delivery. With some more research to be done, I will definitely want to see the final outcome of this project! The day and the conference were concluded with a closing plenary feature a keynote speech on “Systems Engineering in a European Space Company”.
What more can be said besides that this conference has really overturned my previous conviction that long distance flights to attend these symposia are not worth the pain and discomfort.
INSIGHT is the newsletter of International Council on Systems Engineering. It is published four times per year (January, April, July, October). INSIGHT features status and information about INCOSE's technical work, local chapters, and committees and boards. Additionally, related events, editorials, book reviews, trends, and how-to-do articles that are pertinent to the many aspects of a systems engineer's job are also included, as space permits.
Upcoming submission deadlines and themes for INSIGHT
| Issue | Submission Date for General Articles | Theme | Theme Editor | Deadline for Theme Article Proposal* |
| 3rd Qtr 2010 | 8 Aug 2010** | 2010 International Symposium Coverage: Chicago, Illinois, USA | Jack Stein | 11 Nov 2009 |
| 4th Qtr 2010 | 15 Oct 2010 | Systems Development from Deep Sea to Deep Space: Lessons from the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab | Mike O'Driscoll and Sam Seymour | |
| 1st Qtr 2011 | 15 Feb 2011 | Knowledge Management for Systems Engineering | Regina Griego | 21 May 2010 |
| 2nd Qtr 2011 | 15 May 2011 | Systems of Systems and Self-Organizing Security** | Rick Dove, Ken Kepchar, Jennifer Bayuk |
*Submission deadline moves according to International Symposium date
** Please contact the theme editor by 18 August 2010 to propose a theme article.
The July 2010 INSIGHT is ready to view or download on INCOSE Connect.
Special Feature:
The Best of Loughborough: Highlights from the Conference on Systems Engineering Research
Early View (Articles Available Online in Advance of Print)
Initiated by Elsevier in 2008 to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the journal Data and Knowledge Engineering, the Peter P. Chen award honors one person each year for his or her outstanding contributions to the field of conceptual modeling. One person will be selected each year to receive a plaque and check for $1000 (US$). The award is announced and presented each year at the ER Series conference.
The International Test and Evaluation Association (ITEA) is a not-for-profit educational organization founded in 1980 to further the exchange of technical information in the field of test and evaluation. Its members include professionals from industry, government, and academia, who are involved in the development and application of policy and techniques used to assess the effectiveness, reliability, and safety of new and existing systems and products.
The vision of ITEA is to be recognized as the premier professional association for the international Test and Evaluation community. The mission of ITEA is to advance the field of Test and Evaluation worldwide in government, industry and academia. ITEA is open to both individual and corporate members.
ITEA is governed by a Board of Directors, supported by Regional Vice-Presidents. National Committees conduct the work of the association, supported by paid staff based at ITEA’s Fairfax, VA, U.S.A. Central office. ITEA has chapters throughout the United States, plus a chapter based in each of Israel, Australia and Europe.
ITEA conducts an annual symposium, the next being at Glendale, AZ, U.S.A. The theme for this symposium is “The Future of T&E: Evaluating Operational Effectiveness in a Joint Mission Environment”.
ITEA is well connected to the broader systems engineering community. For example, a recent edition of the The ITEA Journal of Test and Evaluation contains an article “The Role of Test and Evaluation in Systems Engineering and Management” by Andrew P. Sage, Ph.D. The Systems Engineering Society of Australia (SESA) runs its annual conference jointly with ITEA.
More information: www.itea.org
http://www.incose.org/practice/techactivities/wg/securitywg/
Current system security strategies are failing and cannot be fixed by security engineers alone. The reason for failure is evident: attack communities operates as intelligent, multi-agent, self organizing, system-of-systems – with swarm intelligence, tight learning loops, fast evolution, and dedicated intent. With few exceptions, the systems being targeted are alone, senseless and defenseless – relying on outside benevolence for protection, whether this be separate security systems, laws and penalties, or perceived probabilities of being an overlooked target.
This working group believes that system engineering cannot succeed without accepting core responsibility for enabling and facilitation effective system security – partly in system requirements, partly in system trade space recognition, but mainly in system thinking applied to concepts of operations and systems architecture. Sustaining system functionality in the face of intelligent determined attack requires self preservation capabilities that adapt and evolve with equal intelligence, determination, and strength of community. This requires full system awareness and adaptability, and system-of-system relationships. Security engineering alone cannot accomplish this.
It is fitting for INCOSE to tackle Next Generation Security, as the issues are leading edge systems engineering issues: architecture, systems of systems, self organizing systems, security tradeoffs with human factors, systems thinking – things that are typically high level integrated-system SE issues.
Participants in this working group’s projects are developing vanguard critical understandings.
Chair: Rick Dove, Stevens Institute of Technology
Co-Chair: TBD
Contact Systems Security Engineering WG for membership and access to the member activity site.
Architecture Working Group –collaborated on the 12 essays of The Interplay of Architecture, Security, and Systems Engineering. published in the July 2009 INSIGHT.
Rommana 10.2 brings over 45 new features in different Rommana Components. To see a partial list of these features, visit:
http://www.rommanasoftware.com/rommana102release.php
No Magic, Inc., claiming to be the leading global provider of integrated modeling software and services, announced a new SysML™ online training course designed to teach system engineers and analysts, test engineers or anyone interested in Systems Engineering everything they need to know about SysML and its use within MagicDraw.
You can download the revision from the SysML.org Specifications page or the OMG web
Atego, claiming to be the leading independent supplier of industrial-grade, collaborative development tools for engineering complex, mission- and safety-critical architectures, systems, software and hardware, has launched Atego Process Director, a ground-breaking, new web-based environment for process definition, management and deployment.

by Jamshid Gharajedaghi (Foreword), Russell L. Ackoff (Author), Herbert Addison (Contributor), Andrew Carey(Contributor)
Publisher: Triarchy Press (18 Mar 2010)
ISBN-10: 0956263151
ISBN-13: 978-0956263155
This gem of a book introduces the extraordinary world of Systems Thinking and its 'Dean', Russell Ackoff, to curious and enquiring managers, teachers, business people - anyone, anywhere who works in an organisation. Finished just before Professor Ackoff's death late in 2009, "Systems Thinking for Curious Managers" opens the door to a joined up way of thinking about things that has profoundly influenced thinkers and doers in the fields of business, politics, economics, biology, psychology. Although Systems Thinking was 'invented' early in the 20th century, even Peter Senge's best-selling "The Fifth Discipline" (Systems Thinking is the fifth discipline) failed to popularise the term. But now, in business and academia, in the public sector and in the search for solutions to the environmental problems we face, Systems Thinking is being talked about everywhere. In the same way, it's only since his death in 2009 that management thinker, writer and guru Russell Ackoff has achieved the reputation he deserves. This timely book presents 40 more of Russ Ackoff's famously witty and incisive f-Laws (or flaws) of business - following on from his 2007 collection "Management f-Laws". All those in this collection are new and previously unpublished. Andrew Carey's extended introduction ties these f-Laws into the rest of Ackoff's work and gives the reader new to Systems Thinking a practical guide to the implications of Systems Thinking for organisations and managers. The Foreword by Jamshid Gharajedaghi is a moving tribute from Ackoff's friend and business partner of many years.TBD

Alexandre Dolgui (Author), Jean-Marie Proth (Author)
Publisher: Springer; 1st Edition. edition (August 14, 2010)
ISBN-10: 184996016X
ISBN-13: 978-1849960168
Supply Chain Engineering considers how modern production and operations management (POM) techniques can respond to the pressures of the competitive global marketplace by integrating all activities in the supply chain, adding flexibility to the system, and drastically reducing production cost.
Several POM challenges are answered through a comprehensive analysis of concepts and models that assist the selection of outsourcing strategies and dynamic pricing policies. Supply Chain Engineering presents inventory management techniques in supply chains, radio frequency identification (RFID) technologies, and methods for the design of flexible and re-configurable manufacturing systems, as well as real-time assignment and scheduling methods. A significant part of the book is also devoted to:
Explanations are given using basic examples and detailed algorithms, while discarding complex and unnecessary theoretical minutiae. In addition, all the examples have been carefully selected with a view to eventual industrial application.
Supply Chain Engineering is written for students and professors in industrial and systems engineering, management science, operations management, and business. It is also an informative reference for industrial managers looking to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their production systems.
Students from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., are the 1st place winners of NASA's systems engineering paper competition. The winning paper, "Cathode/Anode Satellite Thruster for Orbital Repositioning" earned the team a $3,500 scholarship and an invitation to view a future launch at NASA's Kennedy Space Center, Fla.
Gavan Lintern
......A scientific or engineering presentation is a performance. When you present, are you satisfied merely by getting through this performance or do you want it to be as good as you can make it? For many of us in scientific and engineering professions, presentation at a conference is generally a choice; it is rarely a required duty of our employment. Why do we volunteer for that? For some, it comes down to an expenses paid visit to another city, possibly even another country. However, for others, it is a matter of professional pride. We think the work we are doing is significant and we imagine others will benefit from knowing about it. If you fall into that group for whom this is a matter of professional pride, read on.....
A conversation with Peter Senge
This interview with Peter Senge (PS) of SoL (the Society for Organizational Learning) and Massachusetts Institute of Technology was conducted by telephone on April 22, 2010. The interviewer was Faye Benedict (FB) of the Norwegian University of Life Sciences and the EU Comenius Lifelong Learning project “SUPPORT: Partnership and Participation for a Sustainable Tomorrow.”
You are invited to the next presentations in the IIBA Webinar Series:
Introduction to the Certification of Competency in Business Analysis™(CCBA™ )
Monday, July 26, 2010 at 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. EDT (UTC/GMT -4 hours)
Presented by Paula Maychruk, VP Certification and Suzanne Bertschi, Certification Product Manager
International Institute of Business Analysis (IIBA) is pleased to announce a new business analysis certification. The Certification of Competency in Business Analysis™(CCBA™ ) is an intermediate level designation that will launch by the end of 2010. The CCBA™ designation is a stepping stone to obtaining the Certified Business Analysis Professional™(CBAP® ) designation and provides recognition for individuals who have business analysis experience but don't yet meet the requirements for the CBAP® designation.
Key learning points include:
This webinar is open to members and non members. Register now.
----------
Being a BA - Technical Excellence with Tom Karasmanis
Tuesday, July 27, 2010 at 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. EDT (UTC/GMT -4 hours)
Tom is the Chief Architect of IIBA, and a very experienced BA. Over the last 25 years he has worked at all organizational levels and in various roles including project business analysis, strategic work, managing teams of BAs and more.
This webinar is open to members only. Register now.
----------
Please note: The webinars are limited to 1000 participants, and only the first 1000 people who have logged in at the time the presentation begins will have access to the live webinar. If you receive an error message when you log in, that means 1000 people have already logged in and the session is full. If you cannot access the webinar and you are an IIBA member, you can listen to the archived event which will be available on the IIBA website.
These and all previous presentations will be archived on our website after the live viewing date. They will also include audio, plus an email address to direct questions to. Please visit the Public or Members-only Archived Webinars pages.
For more information on our Webinar Series including a list of upcoming topics, please visit the IIBA website.
Questions? Please contact Tracy Cook at webinar@theiiba.org
July 25 – 29, 2010, Seoul, Korea
More information
August 4 - 6, 2010, Siam University, Bangkok, Thailand
More information
August 16, 2010, Lisbon, Portugal
More information
in conjunction with DIS 2010
August 17 2010, Aarhus, Denmark
More information
August 17 - 19, 2010, CSIR International Convention Centre, Pretoria, South Africa
More Information
To be held in conjunction with ICIS 2010
August 18 – 20, 2010, Yamagata University, Yonezawa, Japan
More information
August 22-27, 2010 - Nice, France
More information
23 - 26 August 2010
Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre, Brisbane, Australia
More information
August 28-29, 2010, Santa Clara, CA, USA
More information
August 30 – Sep 3, 2010, Lyon (France)
More information
September 1st & 2nd, 2010, Valenciennes/France
More information
1-3 September 2010, Grenoble Institute of Technology, France
More information
September 05-09, 2011, Lisbon, Portugal.
More information
September, 06th-10th, 2010, University of Luxembourg, Luxemburg
More information
September 8, 2010, Valencia, Spain
More information
September 13, 2010, Hoboken, New Jersey – USA
More information
September 13 - 16, 2010, Renaissance Glendale Hotel & Spa, Glendale, AZ, USA
More information
September 15-17, 2010, Dresden, Germany
More information
September 15 - 18, 2010, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA at the College of William & Mary, Computer Science Department,
More information
Co-located with the International Scientific Colloquium (IWK2010)
September 16, 2010, Ilmenau, Germany
More information
September 20-21, 2010, Antwerp, Belgium
More information
Sept. 20-27 2010, Europa Conference Center, Budapest, Hungary
More information
September 21, 2010, Singapore
More information
21-24 September 2010, Singapore
More information
University Residential Center of Bertinoro, Italy
23-24 September 2010
More information
September 23-24, 2010, Moscow, Russia
More information
September 26-29, 2010, São Carlos - São Paulo - Brazil
More information
September 27, 2010, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
More information
September 27-October 1, 2010, Budapest, Hungary
More information
Located at SASO 2010
September 27th, 2010, Budapest, Hungary
More information
September 27, 2010, Sydney, Australia
More information
September 27, 2010, Sydney, Australia
More information
September 27-October 1, 2010, San Francisco
More information
Sep 27, 2010 - Oct 1, 2010, Sydney, Australia
More information
September 27-October 1, 2010, Budapest, Hungary
More information
September 27 – October 2, Leipzig, Germany
More information
27 September - 2 October, 2010. University Of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
More information
In conjunction with the 18th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference
September 28, 2010, Sydney, Australia
More information
In conjunction with the 18th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference
September 28, 2010, Sydney, Australia
More information
In conjunction with the 18th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference
September 28, 2010 - Sydney, Australia
More information
To be held in conjunction with the RE 2010 Joint Conference
September 28, 2010, Sydney, Australia
More information
A satellite event of ICGT'10
September 28th 2010, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
More information
Joint with 2nd International Workshop on High Performance Computational Systems Biology (HiBi 2010)
September 30 - October 1, 2010, Twente, The Netherlands
Co-locating with
5th International Conference on Graph Transformation (ICGT 2010) , 29 September - 1 October, 2010
17th Annual workshop on Software Model Checking (SPIN 2010), 27 September - 29 September, 2010
More information
In Conjunction with Models 2010
October 3-5, 2010, Oslo, Norway
More information
In Conjunction with Models 2010
October 3-5, 2010, Oslo, Norway
More information
In Conjunction with Models 2010
October 3-8, 2010, Oslo, Norway
More information
In Conjunction with Models 2010
October 3-8, 2010, Oslo, Norway
More information
In Conjunction with Models 2010
October 3-8, 2010, Oslo, Norway
More information
October 3-8, 2010, Oslo, Norway
More information
4 - 6 October, 2010. Keelung, Taiwan.
More information | Brochure
October 4-6, 2010, The Westin Providence, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
More information
October 11 – 14, 2010, Nancy, France
More information
October 16, 2010, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, USA
More information
October 16 – 20, Reykjavik Iceland
More information
October 17 - 20 2010, Buenos Aires, Argentina
More information
October 17-21, 2010, Alexandria, VA, USA
More information
Co-located with SPLASH 2010
In cooperation with ACM SIGPLAN (PENDING)
October 18, 2010, Reno, Nevada, USA
More information
October 19, 2010, MIT Media Lab, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
More information
October 20 – 23, 2010, Lugano, Switzerland
More information
October 21-22,2010 , Broad Auditorium, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
More information
October 25-28, 2010, Hyatt Regency Mission Bay, San Diego, CA, USA
More information
October 26 – 28, 2010, Mϋnchen, Germany
More information
October 27-28, 2010, Hersonissou, Crete, Greece
More information
October 27-29, 2010, Paris, France
More Information
Co-Located with the 21st IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE)
November 1-4, 2010, San Jose, CA, USA
More information
1-4 November 2010, Vancouver, BC, Canada
More information
(Held in conjunction with ER 2010)
November 1-4, 2010, Vancouver, BC, Canada
More information
Nov 7, 2010 - Nov 8, 2010. Taipei, Taiwan
More information
November 7-10th, 2010, American Airlines Conference Center, Fort Worth, TX
More information
November 8-10, 2010, Heythrop Park Hotel, Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire, UK
More information
November 10-12, 2010, Medellín, Colombia
More information
November 11 - 13, 2010, Arlington, VA
More information
November 12, 2010 as part of the Enterprise Engineering Week at the Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands from the 9th of November to the 12th of November
More information
November 15-18, 2010
Hyatt Regency Tech Center – Denver, Colorado, USA
More information
Held in conjunction with the 12th International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods, ICFEM 2010
November 16th, 2010, Shanghai, China
More information
November 23 - 25, 2010, Sharjah-Dubai, UAE, United Arab Emirates
More information
November 26 - 28, 2010, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
More information
December 7-9, 2010, Paris, France
More information
December 10-12, 2010, National Institute Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, India
More information
December 18, 2010, Bangkok, Thailand
More information
January 25-27, 2011, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
More information
March 14-16, 2011 Karlsruhe, Germany
More information
March 14-18, 2011, Grenoble, France
More information
March 21 - 25, 2011, Tunghai University, TaiChung, Taiwan
More information
March 22-24, 2011, Stockholm, Sweden
More information
May 13 - 14, 2011, Falmouth, Cornwall, United Kingdom
More information

The Federal University of Minas Gerais (University Federal de Minas Gerais) in Belo Horizonte, Brazil (UFMG) has introduced, commencing this year, a course in systems engineering (engenharia de sistemas) Brazil. The curriculum combines systems engineering principles with three core discipline areas:
The concept of delivery is the simulation of a multi-disciplinary project.
More information: http://sistemas.eng.ufmg.br/index.htm (in Portuguese)
The goal of SUPPORT -Partnership and Participation for a Sustainable Tomorrow- is to promote and enhance the quality of education for sustainable development by linking schools, research institutions and communities in a web-based network.
At 4th European Conference on Software Architecture
August 23, 2010, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark
IEEE Standard 1471, Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems, was published in 2000 as the first standard aimed at architecture description. In 2007, it was adopted by ISO and since then has been jointly updated by IEEE and ISO as ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010, Systems and software engineering — Architecture description.
This tutorial introduces the key concepts and mechanisms of the newly revised standard, in the context of practical approaches to architectural rendering of software-intensive systems.
James W. Moore, the IEEE Computer Society’s Vice President of Professional Activities, has been named the recipient of the IEEE Charles Proteus Steinmetz Award.
The Steinmetz Award, established in 1979, is the IEEE's top standards honor. Consisting of a bronze medal, certificate, and honorarium, the award recognizes exceptional contributions to the development and/or advancement of standards in electrical and electronics engineering.
Rory V. O’Connor, Claude Y. Laporte
ABSTRACT
This paper outlines the recent development of a series of detailed guidelines known as “Deployment Packages” (DPs) for use with the emerging ISO/IEC 29110 software process lifecycle standard for Very Small Entities (VSEs). Such DPs are intended to provide detailed guidelines and explanation presenting in more detail the processes defined in the ISO/IEC 29110 profiles. This paper will also outline a pilot project initiative currently underway to evaluate these Deployment Packages and assist very small companies in understanding and exploring the potential usage of an international software process development standard.
Specification: A collection of requirements which, when taken together, constitute the criteria that define the functions and attributes of a system, or an item.
Source: ARP4754 - Certification Considerations for Highly-integrated or Complex Aircraft Systems (1996)
Specification: A document that clearly and accurately describes requirements and other characteristics for a product and the procedures to be used to determine that the product satisfies these requirements. Two types of specifications are defined in this Standard: performance and detail. Three states of specifications are defined in this Standard: conceptual, initial, and definitized.
Source: EIA/IS-731.1 - Systems Engineering Capability Model (1996)
Specification: A document that fully describes a design element or its interfaces in terms of requirements (functional, performance, constraints, and design characteristics) and the qualification conditions and procedures for each requirement.
Source: ISO/IEC 26702 (2005), IEEE Std 1220-2005
Specification: A document used in development and procurement that describes the technical requirements for items, materials, and services including the procedures by which it will be determined that the requirements have been met. Specifications may be unique to a specific program (program-peculiar) or they may be common to several applications (general in nature).
Source: Glossary: Defense Acquisition Acronyms and Terms (2009)
Specification: Exact statement of the particular needs to be satisfied, or essential characteristics that a customer requires (in a good, material, method, process, service, system, or work) and which a vendor must deliver.
Source: www.businessdictionary.com (2010)
Specification: a detailed description of the parts of a whole
Source: www.yourdictionary.com (2010)
Specification: a statement or enumeration of particulars, as to actual or required size, quality, performance, terms, etc.: specifications for a new building.
Source: www.yourdictionary.com (2010)
Specification: A detailed, exact statement of particulars, especially a statement prescribing materials, dimensions, and quality of work for something to be built, installed, or manufactured.
Source: www.yourdictionary.com (2010)
Specification: A description of something that is sufficiently detailed to provide someone with all the information necessary to manufacture it.
Source: www.yourdictionary.com/computer/specification
Two themes can be identified within the above definitions. The first is the specification of requirements. The second is the specification of design. That leads to the important distinction between “requirements specifications” and “design specifications”, a distinction that an enterprise should make explicit if there is potential for confusion or misunderstanding.
Some of the definitions include the procedures to be used to determine that the product satisfies the requirements within the definition of a specification. Is a requirements specification or a design specification not a specification if it doesn’t include these procedures? I think not. In fact, there is long established practice of separating:
One of the definitions includes “clearly and accurately” within the definition of “specification”. If it is unclear and inaccurate, is it not a specification, or simply a poor specification. The qualities of an item that make an item a “good” item should never be included in the definition of the item.
PPI was a Bronze Sponsor and Exhibitor at the 2010 INCOSE International Symposium in Chicago over 12 - 15 July, 2010.
Prize Draw Winner - Peter Sjöberg of Volvo Construction Equipment won our prize draw which included an Australian novelty hat, genuine boomerang and an inflatable "Skippy" kangaroo.
Matrix Game - PPI Prize Winner - Holly Kellogg of NAVAIR won a free attendance to PPI's Systems Engineering 5-Day course and workshop, valued over US$2,800.
PPI has, this month, formed a new consultancy business unit, iMobile Productivity, with a mission to improve enterprise productivity through the integration into business and project systems of mobile technology platforms. Devices such as iPad and iPhone with tactile surfaces and continuous internet connectivity at an individual level can increase productivity in many aspects. iMobile Productivity is operating only in Australia at this time. If you would like to discuss how continuous internet connectivity can improve, for example, design reviews, customer interaction in agile development, maintenance solutions, operation of Integrated Product Teams, training solutions, or other potential applications of interest, contact iMP Principal Consultant – IT Michael Fletcher in Australia 03 9876 7345.
Upcoming locations include:
View 2010/2011 Systems Engineering Course Schedule
Upcoming locations include:
View 2010/2011 RA&SW Course Schedule
Upcoming locations include:
View 2010/2011 OCD/CONOPS Course Schedule
Upcoming locations include:
View 2010/2011 Software Engineering Course Schedule
Upcoming locations include:
View 2010/2011 Cognitive Systems Engineering Course Schedule
Kind regards from the SyEN team:
Robert Halligan, Managing Editor, email: rhalligan@ppi-int.com
Alwyn Smit, Editor, email: asmit@ppi-int.com
Luke Simpson, Production, email: lsimpson@ppi-int.com
Project Performance International
PO Box 2385, Ringwood, Vic 3134 Australia
Tel: +61 3 9876 7345
Fax: +61 3 9876 2664
Web: www.ppi-int.com
Email: contact@ppi-int.com
Tell us what you think of SyEN: email to contact@ppi-int.com
If you do not wish to receive a copy monthly of SyEN in future, please reply to this e-mail with "Remove" in the subject line. All removals are acknowledged; you may wish to contact us if acknowledgement is not received within 7 days.
COPYRIGHT 2010 PROJECT PERFORMANCE (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD, ABN 33 055 311 941. May only be copied and distributed in full, and with this Copyright Notice intact.
SyEN makes informative reading for the project professional, containing scores of news and other items summarizing developments in the field of systems engineering and in directly related fields.